Interactive Activity Book

Interactive Activity Book – Evaluation Method 1
About This Project

Care Pathways and Outcomes Study

A longitudinal study exploring how children who entered care before the age of five were faring across different placement types in Northern Ireland. The research team developed bespoke creative tools — post boxes, sticker posters, and an illustrated activity book — to collect both quantitative and qualitative data from children aged 9–13, many of whom had additional needs. The study tracked participants over several years, eventually re-engaging them as young adults.

Location Northern Ireland
Participants Children and young people in care (aged 9–13), their parents and carers, and professionals
Delivered by Queen’s University Belfast — led by PI Dominic McSherry, with researcher Montserrat Fargas-Malet
Method Used Interactive Activity Book with Tactile Warm-Up Tools
Note on the Community Map: The community map featured in this dossier is not from the Care Pathways and Outcomes Study. It originates from the RADICAL project (Respect and Disrespect In Children’s and Adolescents’ Lives), led by Siobhán McAlister (Centre for Children’s Rights, QUB), funded by the ESRC, and a collaboration between QUB, Ulster University, and the University of Strathclyde.
Evaluation Method: 1

Interactive Activity Book

A multi-visit, hands-on approach that replaces clipboards and questionnaires with tactile warm-ups and a co-designed activity book — so participants lead the conversation, not the evaluator.

Phase 0: Logic Model & Topic Mapping

Identify the “Evaluation Gap” this method fills. It is best suited for working with children, young people, or vulnerable adults who would disengage from traditional surveys and feedback forms and evaluations that need both quantitative measures and rich qualitative stories but where participants feel intimidated by formal data collection.

Primary Objective

To collect honest, participant-led quantitative and qualitative data from people who would shut down, rush through, or disengage from standard evaluation tools — by giving them physical control over the process and removing the pressure of sustained eye contact and verbal disclosure.

Key Stakeholders

Service users (especially children, young people, neurodivergent participants, or anyone who finds formal evaluation intimidating), frontline practitioners, project evaluators, funders requiring evidence of lived experience, and advisory or co-design groups.

Reflective Planning Questions — Ask Yourself Before You Begin:
  • “What are my participants likely to find intimidating, boring, or intrusive about a standard evaluation — and which of those barriers can a physical, hands-on tool remove?”
  • “Do I have access to an advisory group or a small number of participants who can co-design the book’s content and activities before the main data collection begins?”
  • “Am I collecting data across more than one visit — and if so, how can the first encounter build enough trust and familiarity to make deeper conversation possible later?”

Part 1: The DIY Step-by-Step Method

1

Co-Design the Tools with Your Audience

Before you make anything, consult the people closest to your participants. Work with advisory groups, advocacy organisations, or a small pilot group to decide what topics matter, what language to use, and what activities will land. This step is non-negotiable — if the book feels like something done to participants rather than with them, it will not work.

The Details:
  • Action: Convene your advisory group and present the broad evaluation themes. Ask them to identify specific topics within each theme that matter to people like them. Use their words, not yours, to populate the book pages and tactile tools.
  • Tip: Start with a blank or semi-blank template and let the group fill it in. A rough first draft co-created with five participants will always outperform a polished version designed by evaluators alone.
Sample Prompt for Your Advisory Group: “We want to find out how people feel about [your evaluation topic]. What are the areas of life where that shows up most? What should we definitely ask about — and what should we definitely avoid?”
2

Build the First Encounter: Tactile Quantitative Tools

Your first visit is not the deep conversation. It is a low-pressure, low-verbal data collection session using physical tools — post boxes, sticker posters, or emoji walls — that let participants respond without having to speak to you directly or make eye contact. This builds familiarity with you and with the process, and it generates quantitative data at the same time.

The Details:
  • Action — Post Boxes: Write each evaluation statement on a separate card. Set up two boxes labelled “Yes” and “No” (or use more nuanced options). Read each statement aloud, pause, and let participants post their card into the box of their choice. Collect and tally cards afterwards.
  • Action — Sticker Posters: Create a laminated poster with numbered statements down one side. Give participants coloured stickers (e.g., green for “always true,” orange for “sometimes true,” red for “never true”). Read each statement, pause, and let them place their sticker. Laminating the poster means you can peel off the stickers and reuse it.
  • Action — Emoji Wall: Print large emoji faces (happy, neutral, sad) and fix them to a wall. Read a statement aloud and ask participants to stand beneath the emoji that matches how they feel. Record where each person goes, then ask a simple follow-up: “Why did you go there?”
  • Action — Community Map: Co-create a large illustrated poster showing places your participants recognise — a school, a bus stop, shops, a park, a police station, places of worship, a cinema, wherever they spend time. Print it at A0 or A3 size and laminate it. Give participants two colours of stickers (e.g., yellow for positive experience, red for negative experience). They place stickers on the locations, and you then work through the map together: “There are a lot of red stickers here — what happens in this place?” The map turns abstract questions about experience into a spatial, visual conversation grounded in real places.
  • Tip: Start with a blank or semi-blank map template and let an advisory group populate the places first. Their version will include locations you would never think of. If you cannot laminate, print multiple copies — you will need a fresh one for each session or group.
  • Tip: The whole point is that participants do not have to look at you, hand you something, or say anything out loud. The physical tool creates a buffer. Protect that buffer — do not hover, do not comment on choices in the moment.
3

Facilitate the Book-Guided Conversation

On your second visit, bring the activity book. Each page covers a different topic and contains a hands-on activity — circling items, placing names on concentric circles, drawing, sticking — that acts as a springboard for conversation. The book gives your participant something to look at, something to do with their hands, and full visibility of what is coming next. They lead. You follow.

The Details:
  • Action: Sit beside (not opposite) the participant. Open the book together. Explain that every page is optional — they can skip anything they want by simply turning the page. Work through each activity, and after they complete it, ask open-ended follow-up questions about what they chose and why.
  • Tip: The book is a conversation stimulus, not a data collection form. The real data comes from what participants say while doing the activity. Record or take detailed notes of the conversation — the book itself is secondary.
  • Tip: If a participant is nervous, let them explore the book on their own terms first. Some will flip straight through it. Others will linger. Both are fine. The book dissipates fear because participants can see exactly what you are going to ask — there are no surprises.
Sample Script at the Start: “This book has different pages about different parts of your life. You’re in charge — if there’s a page you don’t want to do, just turn past it. There’s no wrong answer and no rush. Shall we start?”
4

Harvest and Process the Data

After each session, you have two kinds of data: physical artefacts (cards from post boxes, sticker positions on posters, completed book pages) and spoken data (notes or recordings from the conversations). Both need processing promptly — the physical data is perishable if you reuse tools, and the conversational details fade fast.

The Details:
  • Action — Quantitative: Empty each post box and tally the yes/no splits per statement. Photograph or record each sticker poster before peeling off the stickers. Input all counts into a simple spreadsheet. This is manual, but it is straightforward.
  • Action — Qualitative: Write up your notes or transcribe any recordings as soon as possible after the session. Use a framework approach: organise responses by the book’s page topics (each page becomes a theme) and look for patterns across participants.
  • Tip: Keep the completed book pages as a visual reference when reviewing your notes — even if the pages themselves are not your primary data, they jog your memory of what the participant was doing when they said something important.

Part 2: The Realist Pathway

Inputs
Ingredients: A co-designed activity book (printed, one per participant), post boxes or sticker posters for the quantitative warm-up, a co-designed community map poster (laminated, A0 or A3), coloured stickers, statement cards, laminated posters, a recording device or notebook, and at least two facilitators per session.
Mechanism
The Spark: Traditional evaluation puts all the power in the evaluator’s hands — they ask, the participant must answer, face to face, on the spot. This method reverses that dynamic. The tactile tools remove the need for verbal disclosure in the first encounter, building trust without pressure. The book then makes the invisible visible: participants can see every topic coming, skip what they want, and focus on a physical task instead of the evaluator’s gaze. This transfers control to the participant, which reduces anxiety and unlocks honest, detailed responses that no survey or feedback form would produce.
Outcomes
The Impact: Participants who would otherwise disengage, rush through, or give guarded answers instead provide rich qualitative accounts alongside clean quantitative data. The method generates a large volume of high-quality data in a short time, and because the tools are adaptable across abilities and needs, no participant is excluded from the evaluation.

Evidence Manifest

Documenting how the Mechanism was verified through specific data collection.

Evidence Type What it Proves Data Source
Behavioural
Participant Control & Agency
The book gave participants visible, tangible control over the evaluation process. They could see what was coming, skip pages freely, and choose their level of engagement — even in situations where external pressure to participate existed. This proves the mechanism of transferred control works in practice. Facilitator observation across multiple sessions with children aged 9–13 in diverse placements and with varying additional needs.
Data Quality
Volume and Depth of Responses
The method produced enough quantitative and qualitative data across multiple life domains to support sustained, rigorous analysis. This proves the tools generate robust evaluation data, not just surface-level feedback. Quantitative tallies from post boxes and sticker posters, plus notes and recordings from book-guided conversations, analysed using framework analysis.
Inclusivity
Universal Participation Across Abilities
Every participant could take part regardless of verbal ability, literacy level, confidence, or additional needs. The tools were easily adaptable in the moment — facilitators adjusted on the fly without changing the core method. This proves the approach removes barriers that standard evaluation tools create. Facilitator reflections on working with neurodivergent children, children with learning difficulties, and participants with varying communication styles across multiple sessions.
Reporting Hacks: Turning Activity Books & Tactile Data into Proof

Don’t just write a boring report. Use the stuff you actually made during the session.

The Sticker Snapshot

Your sticker posters are already a visual data set. A photograph of each poster — with green, orange, and red stickers clustered around different statements — tells a story at a glance that no bar chart can match. Funders and stakeholders respond to visual evidence they can immediately read.

THE HACK: Photograph every sticker poster before you peel them, and drop those images straight into your report as “participant response maps” alongside the numerical tallies.
The Page-Turn Audit

Which book pages did participants skip? Which ones made them pause and talk for ten minutes? The pattern of engagement across your activity book pages is itself a finding — it tells you what your community cares about and what they are not ready to discuss.

THE HACK: Create a simple grid showing which pages each participant engaged with, skipped, or lingered on — then present it as an “engagement heat map” that reveals priority themes.
The Quote-and-Doodle Pair

When a participant draws or sticks something on a book page and then says something powerful about it, you have a natural pairing: the visual artefact and the spoken insight. Together, they are far more compelling than either alone — especially when presenting to non-academic audiences.

THE HACK: Scan or photograph the most striking book pages and pair each one with a short anonymised quote from the conversation it triggered, then use these as pull-out panels in your report.

The “One-Sentence” Report

“Because we used Interactive Activity Books, participants in our community felt safe and in control enough to share detailed, honest accounts of their lived experience that no survey would have captured.”

Your Voice Matters|Built by Practitioners|For Practitioners

Help us improve this tool.

Tell us who you are, what you used, and what would make it better. It takes two minutes.

Give Feedback →